SAVIMS Documents

Summary We represent a group of concerned citizens, including medical and legal professionals, addressing this letter to challenge your vaccination policy. We assert that SARS CoV-2 poses minimal risk to healthy young people, with natural immunity proving more effective than vaccine-induced immunity. Despite extensive medical evidence and high natural immunity rates, your policy incorrectly treats

Summary Many lawyers and executives justify vaccine mandates using Section 36 of South Africa’s Bill of Rights, which allows rights to be limited if reasonable and justifiable in a democratic society. This includes factors like the importance of the limitation’s purpose and the availability of less restrictive means. However, these mandates promote unproven SARS-CoV-2 vaccines

Summary According to various ethical and legal standards, including the South African Constitution and the National Health Act, informed consent is mandatory before administering any medical treatment. It is asserted that individuals who received Covid-19 vaccines did not receive truthful information about the risks and benefits, rendering their consent invalid. The phrase “safe and effective”

Summary The text is a series of probing questions designed to evaluate the trustworthiness and basis of assertions regarding the safety and effectiveness of mRNA or DNA vaccines. It queries any potential conflicts of interest, the professional background and affiliations of the individual, and their sources of income and funding. It also examines whether the

Summary The document critically examines the effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, questioning their ability to prevent infection and transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It asserts that there is no reliable scientific evidence supporting the vaccines’ effectiveness in preventing infection or transmission. It cites numerous studies indicating the vaccines’ limited impact, and highlights flaws in

Summary The document “COVID-19 Mandates: Medical Analysis with respect to South African Constitutional Criteria” by HJ Edeling argues that COVID-19 vaccine mandates are medically unjustifiable. It claims that the current vaccines are experimental genetic interventions that may cause more harm than good. The analysis suggests that risks associated with the vaccines outweigh their benefits and

Summary In an open letter dated 10 August 2021, addressed to President Cyril Ramaphosa and copied to Health Minister Dr. Phaahla, serious concerns regarding the health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic were raised. Follow-up communications on 17 and 26 August received only acknowledgments of receipt, without substantive responses. Supported by 3510 individuals, the

Summary In an open letter to President Ramaphosa, the authors express grave concerns about the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa, criticising the reliance on official narratives from global health organisations and mainstream media, and highlighting the adverse effects of these policies on public health and the economy. They argue that current mRNA