Summary
The document “COVID-19 Mandates: Medical Analysis with respect to South African Constitutional Criteria” by HJ Edeling argues that COVID-19 vaccine mandates are medically unjustifiable. It claims that the current vaccines are experimental genetic interventions that may cause more harm than good. The analysis suggests that risks associated with the vaccines outweigh their benefits and that there are effective alternative treatments and preventive measures, such as vitamins, zinc, quercetin, melatonin, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine. The document emphasises the importance of individualised medical care and argues against coercive vaccination policies, highlighting potential legal and ethical issues. It calls for the termination of any forced vaccination efforts and suggests that no risk-benefit analysis currently supports recommending COVID-19 vaccination to any group based on medical grounds.