SAVIMS

Ethics

COVID-19, Covid-19 vaccines, Ethics, Other scientific evidence, Reference Library, Vaccine safety & adverse events, Vaccines, Viral illnesses

Government Reports Reveal Alarming COVID Vaccination Risks

Reference: The Exposé. (2022, October 16). Government reports prove COVID vaccination is killing hundreds of thousands every week & confidential Pfizer docs confirm your government knew it would happen. The Exposé. https://expose-news.com/2022/10/16/covid-jab-killing-millions-gov-knew-it-would-happen/ Summary: The article from The Exposé asserts that government reports and confidential Pfizer documents indicate that COVID-19 vaccinations are causing significant excess mortality,

COVID-19, Covid-19 vaccines, Ethics, Other scientific evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type, Statistical evidence, Vaccine safety & adverse events, Vaccines, Viral illnesses

Analysis of COVID Vaccine Injury Claims Data

Reference: Greene, J. (2022, October 13). New data is out on COVID vaccine injury claims. What’s to make of it? Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/new-data-is-out-covid-vaccine-injury-claims-whats-make-it-2022-10-12/ Summary: The article discusses recent data regarding COVID-19 vaccine injury claims, following a Freedom of Information Act request to the CDC. The CDC promised to release data from its “v-safe” system, which monitors

COVID-19, Covid-19 vaccines, Ethics, Other scientific evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type, Vaccine safety & adverse events, Vaccines, Viral illnesses

Concerns Over mRNA Vaccine Safety Raised in Open Letter to Health Minister

Reference: Britz-McKibbin, P., Chaufan, C., Gutschi, L. M., Hardie, J., Mallard, B., Nakatsu, K., Oldfield, P. R., Pelech, S., & Shaw, C. A. (2022). Open letter to the Health Minister regarding Health Canada’s use of the mRNA vaccines. Canadian Covid Care Alliance. Retrieved from www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org Summary: In a letter addressed to Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos,

COVID-19, Covid-19 vaccines, Ethics, Peer-reviewed evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type, Vaccines, Viral illnesses

Censorship and Suppression of COVID-19 Heterodoxy

Reference: Shir-Raz, Y., Elisha, E., Martin, B., Ronel, N., & Guetzkow, J. (2022). Censorship and suppression of COVID-19 heterodoxy: Tactics and counter-tactics. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09479-4 Summary: This article examines the censorship of dissenting medical views on COVID-19 by various authorities and media. It highlights tactics used against prominent doctors and scientists who challenged mainstream narratives, including

COVID-19, Covid-19 vaccines, Ethics, Other scientific evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type, Vaccines, Viral illnesses

BMJ’s Concerns on Facebook’s Fact-Checking Practices

Reference: Godlee, F., & Abbasi, K. (2022). Open letter from BMJ to Facebook about inappropriate censoring of serious data integrity issues in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine trial. Retrieved from https://www.scientificfreedom.dk/2021/12/18/open-letter-from-bmj-to-facebook-about-inappropriate-censoring-of-serious-data-integrity-issues-in-pf Summary: In an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg, editors Fiona Godlee and Kamran Abbasi of The BMJ express grave concerns regarding Facebook’s fact-checking practices, particularly in

Ethics, Peer-reviewed evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type

The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine

Reference: Jureidini, J., & McHenry, L. B. (2022). The illusion of evidence-based medicine. BMJ, 376, o702. http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o702 Summary: The authors Jon Jureidini and Leemon B. McHenry argue that evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been compromised by corporate interests, inadequate regulation, and the commercialisation of academia. Although EBM was intended to provide a robust scientific foundation for

Ethics, Other scientific evidence, Reference Library, Resource Type

Understanding Levels of Evidence in Clinical Practice

Reference: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2009). Levels of evidence. Retrieved from https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009 Summary: The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine’s Levels of Evidence document provides a structured approach to evaluating clinical evidence across various question types, such as therapy, diagnosis, and prognosis. It categorises evidence into levels, ranging from systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

Scroll to Top